ruff_figural_fluency_test
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| ruff_figural_fluency_test [2019/07/22 09:48] – trynke | ruff_figural_fluency_test [2025/02/05 13:49] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ====== Ruff Figural Fluency Test ====== | ====== Ruff Figural Fluency Test ====== | ||
| - | The RFFT is a measure of nonverbal fluency, a parameter of executive cognitive functioning. The RFFT consists of five parts, each presenting a different stimulus pattern of dots, in which the task is to draw as many unique designs as possible within a set time period. | + | The Ruff Figural Fluency Test (RFFT) ([[sections|section]]: |
| + | * [[1A Visit 1]] (n = ~91.000) | ||
| + | * [[3A Visit 1]] | ||
| - | The RFFT was measured on paper in approximately 50% of adult and elderly participants | + | ===== Background ===== |
| - | The RFFT will be measured | + | |
| + | The RFFT is a measure of nonverbal fluency, a parameter of executive cognitive functioning ([[sections|section]]: | ||
| + | |||
| + | The RFFT was measured on paper in adult and elderly | ||
| + | In assessment [[2A Visit 1|2A]], executive cognitive functioning was measured | ||
| + | In assessment | ||
| ==== Protocol RFFT on Paper ==== | ==== Protocol RFFT on Paper ==== | ||
| Line 67: | Line 74: | ||
| Results of the study show that the mean number of unique designs increased significantly from 73 (+/-26) at baseline to 79 (+/- 27) at first follow-up, and 83 (+/- 26) at second follow-up overall (p < 0.001). | Results of the study show that the mean number of unique designs increased significantly from 73 (+/-26) at baseline to 79 (+/- 27) at first follow-up, and 83 (+/- 26) at second follow-up overall (p < 0.001). | ||
| - | === RFFT in Lifelines === | + | ==== RFFT in Lifelines |
| The RFFT may be analyzed by humans or by computer software, yielding similar results ((Elderson, M.F., Pham, S., Eersel, M.E.A. van, Study, L.C., Wolffenbuttel, | The RFFT may be analyzed by humans or by computer software, yielding similar results ((Elderson, M.F., Pham, S., Eersel, M.E.A. van, Study, L.C., Wolffenbuttel, | ||
| Line 75: | Line 82: | ||
| ==== Variables ==== | ==== Variables ==== | ||
| + | | **English** | ||
| + | | unique designs (part 1-5) | rfft_unique_adu_m_1_01-05 | ||
| + | | perseverative errors (part 1-5) | rfft_errors_adu_m_1_01-05 | ||
| + | | violations (part 1-5) | rfft_violations_adu_m_1_01-05 | ||
| + | | empty (part 1-5) | rfft_empty_adu_m_1_01-05 | ||
ruff_figural_fluency_test.1563788913.txt.gz · Last modified: (external edit)
