ruff_figural_fluency_test
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| ruff_figural_fluency_test [2019/08/30 16:08] – trynke | ruff_figural_fluency_test [2026/10/20 14:40] (current) – [Table] simone | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ====== Ruff Figural Fluency Test ====== | ====== Ruff Figural Fluency Test ====== | ||
| + | The Ruff Figural Fluency Test (RFFT) ([[sections|section]]: | ||
| + | * [[1A Visit 1]] (n = ~91.000) | ||
| + | * [[3A Visit 1]] (n = ~73.000) | ||
| + | * [[4A Visit 1]] (currently ongoing) | ||
| + | ===== Background ===== | ||
| + | |||
| The RFFT is a measure of nonverbal fluency, a parameter of executive cognitive functioning ([[sections|section]]: | The RFFT is a measure of nonverbal fluency, a parameter of executive cognitive functioning ([[sections|section]]: | ||
| - | The RFFT was measured on paper in ~87, | + | The RFFT was measured on paper in adult and elderly |
| - | In assessment [[2A Visit 1|2A]], executive cognitive functioning was measured with [[CogState]] | + | In assessment [[2A Visit 1|2A]], executive cognitive functioning was measured with [[CogState]] |
| + | In assessment [[3A Visit 1|3A]] and [[4A Visit 1|4A]], both the RFFT and CogState | ||
| ==== Protocol RFFT on Paper ==== | ==== Protocol RFFT on Paper ==== | ||
| Line 37: | Line 44: | ||
| - the number of empty dot configurations. | - the number of empty dot configurations. | ||
| As an index of planning efficiency, the error ratio can be calculated. The error ratio can be calculated by summing the number of unique designs and the number of perseverative errors across the five different parts, and then dividing the total number of perseverative errors by the total number of unique designs. The error ratio assesses the degree to which the respondent is able to minimize repetition while maximizing unique productions ((Ruff, R.M. (1996). Ruff Figural Fluency Test: Professional Manual. Lutz (United States): Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.)). | As an index of planning efficiency, the error ratio can be calculated. The error ratio can be calculated by summing the number of unique designs and the number of perseverative errors across the five different parts, and then dividing the total number of perseverative errors by the total number of unique designs. The error ratio assesses the degree to which the respondent is able to minimize repetition while maximizing unique productions ((Ruff, R.M. (1996). Ruff Figural Fluency Test: Professional Manual. Lutz (United States): Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.)). | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Protocol RFFT on tablet ==== | ||
| + | During [[3A visit 1]] and [[4A visit 1]], the RFFT was performed with a tablet with a stylus pen.\\ | ||
| + | Instructions were given by a pre-recorded movie on the tablet. | ||
| + | In addition to the outcomes mentioned in the section above, outcomes on strategy and validity were added. | ||
| + | |||
| ==== Exclusion criteria ==== | ==== Exclusion criteria ==== | ||
| Line 44: | Line 57: | ||
| * The participant scores <26 on the Mini Mental State Examination. | * The participant scores <26 on the Mini Mental State Examination. | ||
| * The participant has participated in the PREVEND study less than a month prior to his/her visit to the LifeLines facility. | * The participant has participated in the PREVEND study less than a month prior to his/her visit to the LifeLines facility. | ||
| + | |||
| + | In [[3A visit 1]] and [[4A visit 1]], a Lifelines participant could not participate in the RFFT if her/she was not sufficiently able to use a tablet without assistence and / or had a hearing impairment. | ||
| ==== Validity of the RFFT ==== | ==== Validity of the RFFT ==== | ||
| Line 75: | Line 90: | ||
| ==== Variables ==== | ==== Variables ==== | ||
| - | | **English** | + | | **Label English** |
| - | | RFFT Type | RFFT_TYPE | + | | unique designs (part 1-5) | unique designs (part 1) | rfft_unique_adu_m_1_01-05 |
| - | | Unique designs | + | | perseverative errors (part 1-5) | perseverative errors (part 1-5) | rfft_errors_adu_m_1_01-05 |
| - | | Perseverative errors | + | | violations (part 1-5) | violations (part 1-5) | rfft_violations_adu_m_1_01-05 |
| - | | Violations | + | | empty (part 1-5) |
| - | | Empty | RFFT_EMPTY | + | | strategy: starting point is next point (clockwise) (part 1) | strategy: starting point is next point (clockwise) (part 1) | rfft_increasestart_adu_m_1_01-05 |
| + | | strategy: starting point is next point (counterclockwise) (part 1) | strategy: starting point is next point (counterclockwise) (part 1) | rfft_decreasestart_adu_m_1_01-05 | ||
| + | | strategy: same starting point (part 1) | strategy: same starting point (part 1) | rfft_samestart_m_1_01-05 | ||
| + | | valid patterns (part 1) | valid patterns (part 1) | rfft_valid_adu_m_1_01-05 | ||
| + | | time at the start of the rfft | tijdstip start van de rfft | rfft_starttime_adu_m_1 | ||
| + | | time at the end of the rfft | tijdstip einde van de rfft | rfft_endtime_adu_m_1 | ||
ruff_figural_fluency_test.1567181297.txt.gz · Last modified: (external edit)
