User Tools

Site Tools


connective_tissue_disease_csq

This is an old revision of the document!


Connective Tissue Disease (CTQ)

The Connective Tissue Disease Screening Questionnaire (CSQ) is a highly reproducible, sensitive, and moderately specific instrument for screening subjects with potential Connective Tissue Disease (CTD).

Background

Epidemiologic studies of the incidence of connective tissue diseases (CTDs) or their potential associations with exogenous risk factors are limited by the low prevalence, diverse manifestations, lack of specific diagnostic tests, and the expense associated with confirming the diagnosis. Screening by questionnaires such as the CTQ is a useful, validated, efficient case-finding strategy for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and ankylosing spondylitis.

The CSQ was developed in English and translated to Dutch. It has 30 items and can be completed within 30 minutes.
For all intended purposes a person who does not meet the CTD criteria by the CSQ, as described below, does not have a CTD. The instrument can be used to identify a smaller group for subsequent detailed, specific examination. It should prove useful in population studies of the incidence, prevalence, and etiology of CTDs1).

Diagnostic criteria

An algorithm for identifying potential CTD based on the ACR or published clinical criteria was used.

CTD Diagnostic criteria
Rheumatoid Arthritis (4 out of 6 criteria) swelling of wrist, metacarpophalangeal, or proximal interphalangeal joints for more than 6 weeks
swelling of three or more joints for more than 6 weeks
swelling of wrist, metacarpophalangeal, or proximal interphalangeal joints for more than 6 weeks
symmetric joint swelling
rheumatoid nodules
positive test result for rheumatoid factor.
X-ray findings were not ascertained.
Lupus (SLE) (4 out of 11 criteria) malar rash
discoid rash
photosensitivity
oral ulcers
arthritis
serositis
proteinuria
hematologic disorder (anemia, leukopenia, low platelet count)
positive antinuclear antibody (ANA) titer
alopecia and Raynaud’s phenomenon*
seizures and psychosis were excluded*
Scleroderma (1 major or 2> minor criteria) major: skin thickening proximal to the metacarpophalangeal joints
minor: sclerodactyly, digital pitting scars or loss of substance from the finger pad
minor: pulmonary fibrosis
polymyositis or dermatomyositis (2 out of 4 criteria) muscle weakness for more than 3 months
upper extremity proximal muscle weakness for more than 3 months
lower extremity proximal muscle weakness for more than 3 months
a history of an elevated muscle enzyme level (creatinine phosphokinase)
electromyography and muscle biopsy results were not ascertained.
Sjögren's syndrome (1 of 2 criteria) dry eyes and dry mouth
positive serologic test results (ANA or rheumatoid factor) plus dry eyes or dry mouth
lip biospy, Rose-bengal staining, and Schirmer’s test results were not ascertained.
Raynaud’s phenomenon cold sensitivity plus white, blue, or purple color changes of the fingers on exposure to cold
Mixed connective tissue disease (4 out of 5 criteria) synovitis as defined by the RA algorithm (see above)
hand edema
Raynaud’s phenomenon (see above)
myositis as defined by the polymyositis/dermatomyositis algorithm (see above)
acrosclerosis

*Alopecia and Raynaud’s phenomenon were demonstrated by Tan and colleagues to have good sensitivity for SLE but lower specificity in distinguishing SLE from other CTDs. These were included because the goal of our study was to develop a highly sensitive instrument for detecting any CTD.
*Seizures and psychosis were not included because of their relatively low sensitivity (12 and 13%, respectively) in the study by Tan and colleagues. Results of tests for immunologic disorders, anti-Smith (Sm) antibody, anti-double stranded DNA (dsDNA) antibody, and false positive serologic test for syphilis were not ascertained by questionnaire because we thought that most patients would not know the results of these laboratory tests.

Validation

See2)

Sensitivity and Specificity
Sensitivity of the CSQ (the proportion meeting CTD criteria on the CSQamong those with confirmed disease) ranged from 83% to 96% for individual CTDs. Specificity of the CSQ (the proportion not meeting CTD criteria among those without confirmed disease) ranged from 83 to 93%. Specificity for individual CTDs was better among general medical control subjects than among non-CTD control subjects. Specificity was lowest for polymyositis/dermatomyositis and Sjogren’s syndrome. Likelihood ratios (the ability of the test to distinguish between diseased and nondiseased subjects) ranged from 5.0 for Sjogren’s syndrome to 11.9 for MCTD1.

Stratified Analysis of Specificity
Socioeconomic status was measured by educational level and health insurance status. We found significantly lower specificity among subjects with Medicaid or no health insurance and slightly lower specificity among less-educated subjects and those who were nonwhite. Specificity for detecting certain CTDs was significantly lower in patients with heart disease and depression.

Predictive Values
Positive predictive values in the study population, where the prevalence of CTD was much higher than in the general population, ranged from 23.5 to 84.9%. Positive predictive values in the general population, calculated assuming prevalence rates from population-based studies of CTD, ranged from 0.03% to 9.7%. As one would expect, the highest positive predictive value was for RA, the CTD with the highest prevalence in the general population. Negative predictive values were higher than 92% in the study population and higher than 99% in the general population.

Reliability
The K statistic calculated to evaluate test-retest reliability for detection of any potential CTD was 0.82, a rate indicating “excellent” reproducibility. Test-retest reliability values for specific CTDs were 0.50 for SLE, 0.80 for RA, 0.68 for scleroderma, 0.56 for polymyositis/dermatomyositis, 0.71 for Sjogren’s syndrome, and 0.68 for MCTD.

Variables

1) , 2)
Karlson, E. W.et al. (1995). A connective tissue disease screening questionnaire for population studies. Annals of epidemiology 5(4), 297-302
You could leave a comment if you were logged in.
connective_tissue_disease_csq.1571053547.txt.gz · Last modified: 2025/02/05 14:49 (external edit)